I personally would like to thank Irvin Muchnick for providing in his rambling blogs all the evidence necessary against attorney Charles Chalmers. When a complaint is filed with the California Bar Association for an obvious conflict of interest, it shouldn't be difficult to prove. The complaint, along with Muchnick's blog entries, will be presented as soon as the alleged new freelance settlement is scuttled, as Muchnick knows will happen. I actually feel sorry for Chalmers. I think he believed he was helping freelance writers at first, however as attorney for the objectors, it is a clear conflict of interest to get involved with a new settlement.
On the subject of his defamation lawsuit, Muchnick refuses to give up. Though now referring to the victim as "alleged" and changing the investigation from governmental to a "U S A Swimming investigation," the failed writer is treading on thin ice. Muchnick weaseled out of the defamation suit by removing all references to the minor plaintiff, but is continuing to put a spotlight on the alleged 2012 incident. He's trying to walk a tightrope in reprinting what the court said he is allowed to do, but the plaintiffs have reserved the right to re-file the lawsuit should Muchnick step over the line. It's just a matter of time before he can't help himself and does just that.
No comments:
Post a Comment